<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Your Blogging Frequency Hurting Your Blog?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.homestomper.com/blogging-frequency/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.homestomper.com/blogging-frequency/</link>
	<description>Guerrilla Real Estate Marketing Tips from HomeStomper</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 18:40:35 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Best Time To Promote Your New Blog — Real Estate Technology &#124; REtechSource</title>
		<link>http://www.homestomper.com/blogging-frequency/comment-page-1/#comment-56156</link>
		<dc:creator>The Best Time To Promote Your New Blog — Real Estate Technology &#124; REtechSource</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 18:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.homestomper.com/?p=1279#comment-56156</guid>
		<description>[...] discussing this with Ricardo Bueno he pointed to this post over on ProBlogger that has similar [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] discussing this with Ricardo Bueno he pointed to this post over on ProBlogger that has similar [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Best Time To Promote Your New Blog — HomeStomper</title>
		<link>http://www.homestomper.com/blogging-frequency/comment-page-1/#comment-893</link>
		<dc:creator>The Best Time To Promote Your New Blog — HomeStomper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 08:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.homestomper.com/?p=1279#comment-893</guid>
		<description>[...] discussing this with Ricardo Bueno he pointed to this post over on ProBlogger that has similar [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] discussing this with Ricardo Bueno he pointed to this post over on ProBlogger that has similar [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Eckenrode</title>
		<link>http://www.homestomper.com/blogging-frequency/comment-page-1/#comment-886</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Eckenrode</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:06:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.homestomper.com/?p=1279#comment-886</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&#039;#comment-885&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Ricardo Bueno&lt;/a&gt; - doh! you spilled the beans on my next post. everyone who read Ricardo&#039;s comment, please act excited and/or impressed when the next HomeStomper article is published :)

as for your comments on post frequency, you&#039;re absolutely correct. nothing is wrong with daily posts. even short ones. it&#039;s when the blogger is simply posting in order to keep the daily schedule that content can dramatically suffer.

see, everyone is brilliant. and i just hate to say brilliant people skimp on content because the world suffers for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='#comment-885' rel="nofollow">@Ricardo Bueno</a> &#8211; doh! you spilled the beans on my next post. everyone who read Ricardo&#8217;s comment, please act excited and/or impressed when the next HomeStomper article is published <img src='http://www.homestomper.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>as for your comments on post frequency, you&#8217;re absolutely correct. nothing is wrong with daily posts. even short ones. it&#8217;s when the blogger is simply posting in order to keep the daily schedule that content can dramatically suffer.</p>
<p>see, everyone is brilliant. and i just hate to say brilliant people skimp on content because the world suffers for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ricardo Bueno</title>
		<link>http://www.homestomper.com/blogging-frequency/comment-page-1/#comment-885</link>
		<dc:creator>Ricardo Bueno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 08:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.homestomper.com/?p=1279#comment-885</guid>
		<description>Hey Mark, 

You know, you raised a very good point in the comments the other day! Here&#039;s where I stand, I don&#039;t mind daily posts if they&#039;re the short &amp; sweet kind that give you something to think about. If they&#039;re long-winded posts however, 2 - 3 times per week will suffice. Anything more than that, you run the risk of pushing out fluff pieces (as you suggested) without really knowing about it. 

The other part of your comment was an excellent recommendation for those starting out. And that suggestion is to have content pre-written (somewhere in the field of 10 - 15 posts ready) before launching your new blog. This way, your site is &quot;fully dressed up&quot; so-to-speak and ready for launch. 

Anyway, thanks again, for sharing your perspective. It was just what I was looking for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Mark, </p>
<p>You know, you raised a very good point in the comments the other day! Here&#8217;s where I stand, I don&#8217;t mind daily posts if they&#8217;re the short &amp; sweet kind that give you something to think about. If they&#8217;re long-winded posts however, 2 &#8211; 3 times per week will suffice. Anything more than that, you run the risk of pushing out fluff pieces (as you suggested) without really knowing about it. </p>
<p>The other part of your comment was an excellent recommendation for those starting out. And that suggestion is to have content pre-written (somewhere in the field of 10 &#8211; 15 posts ready) before launching your new blog. This way, your site is &#8220;fully dressed up&#8221; so-to-speak and ready for launch. </p>
<p>Anyway, thanks again, for sharing your perspective. It was just what I was looking for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
